- From: Jon Dart <jdart@tibco.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:15:28 -0700
- To: "'public-ws-chor@w3.org '" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
I haven't received any feedback to the use case diagrams I drew up. Are these sufficiently realistic to be useful? Is the use of UML diagrams helpful, or are there too many limitations? Is it worthwhile adding additional text around these so that they could be included in the requirements doc? Also, IMO this exercise results in requirements that impact the choreography language. In particular, the need to have nested sub-choreographies (with MEPs a special case of these) and to have error handling facilities. Any comments on this? --Jon
Received on Monday, 30 June 2003 12:15:42 UTC