W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > June 2003

Re: choreography protocol

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 09:30:18 +0200
Message-ID: <3EF6AC8A.1010002@crf.canon.fr>
To: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
CC: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, public-ws-chor@w3.org

Ugo, did you look at "WSDL 1.2 Part2: Patterns" [1]? Would this help?

Jean-Jacques.

[1] 
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-patterns.html>

Ugo Corda wrote:

> Yes, relying on the WSDL binding works when you can express that
> binding in your spec. But what if you are writing a spec (e.g. a
> choreography spec) that prefers to leave WSDL bindings unspecified
> but still wants to talk about request/response on the same channel
> vs. on different channels? WSDL right now does not specify any way to
> express that.
Received on Monday, 23 June 2003 03:29:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:21 GMT