Re: choreography protocol

Ugo, did you look at "WSDL 1.2 Part2: Patterns" [1]? Would this help?

Jean-Jacques.

[1] 
<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-patterns.html>

Ugo Corda wrote:

> Yes, relying on the WSDL binding works when you can express that
> binding in your spec. But what if you are writing a spec (e.g. a
> choreography spec) that prefers to leave WSDL bindings unspecified
> but still wants to talk about request/response on the same channel
> vs. on different channels? WSDL right now does not specify any way to
> express that.