Re: choreography protocol

"Jean-Jacques Dubray" <jjd@eigner.com> writes:
> 
> I don't have much time to follow the latest developments of WSDL and MEP
> might have well solved that problem. In WSDL 1.1, an operation can only
> be a request with an optional response and any number of faults. So if
> you wanted to describe something like 
> request ->          / request processed signal <- 
>               / response <- / 
> response processed signal ->
> 
> you would need at least two operations. If would be really great if WSDL
> 1.2 could support such protocol natively via MEPs for instance?

That's precisely what MEPs are for.

Sanjiva.