- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 09:36:11 +0600
- To: "Jean-Jacques Dubray" <jjd@eigner.com>, "'Ugo Corda'" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
"Jean-Jacques Dubray" <jjd@eigner.com> writes: > > I don't have much time to follow the latest developments of WSDL and MEP > might have well solved that problem. In WSDL 1.1, an operation can only > be a request with an optional response and any number of faults. So if > you wanted to describe something like > request -> / request processed signal <- > / response <- / > response processed signal -> > > you would need at least two operations. If would be really great if WSDL > 1.2 could support such protocol natively via MEPs for instance? That's precisely what MEPs are for. Sanjiva.
Received on Saturday, 21 June 2003 23:36:12 UTC