W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > June 2003

Re: choreography protocol

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 09:36:11 +0600
Message-ID: <01cc01c3386f$70c80d70$02c8a8c0@lankabook2>
To: "Jean-Jacques Dubray" <jjd@eigner.com>, "'Ugo Corda'" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>

"Jean-Jacques Dubray" <jjd@eigner.com> writes:
> 
> I don't have much time to follow the latest developments of WSDL and MEP
> might have well solved that problem. In WSDL 1.1, an operation can only
> be a request with an optional response and any number of faults. So if
> you wanted to describe something like 
> request ->          / request processed signal <- 
>               / response <- / 
> response processed signal ->
> 
> you would need at least two operations. If would be really great if WSDL
> 1.2 could support such protocol natively via MEPs for instance?

That's precisely what MEPs are for.

Sanjiva.
Received on Saturday, 21 June 2003 23:36:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:21 GMT