W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > June 2003

RE: Revised: Mission Statement

From: Jean-Jacques Dubray <jjd@eigner.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:41:43 -0400
To: "'Yaron Y. Goland'" <ygoland@bea.com>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000a01c33027$a632c9f0$1b6e050a@JJD>

We should not tie it to a particular WSDL version (what happens in the
future or if WSDL produces a new version before ws-chor work is
finished?) "WSDL based" is a bit too strong for me, but I can live with

I don't like the work "describe", do you mean "model"? It also does not
clearly talk to a purpose of describing or modeling.

"agrees to accept" does not sounds correct to me. What about "exchange"
or "interchange"?

At this point I still like Daniel's mission statement and the slight
changes I added with suggestions from others.


>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org
>>On Behalf Of Yaron Y. Goland
>>Sent: Dienstag, 10. Juni 2003 19:32
>>To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
>>Subject: RE: Revised: Mission Statement
>>I would propose the following simplification:
>>The mission of the W3C Web Service Choreography Working Group is to
>>WSDL 1.2 based machine readable XML language that can describe the
>>set of message sequences a group of cooperating web service peers
>>	Yaron
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org
>>> [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Monica J. Martin
>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:06 AM
>>> To: Jean-Jacques Dubray
>>> Cc: jdart@tibco.com; public-ws-chor@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: Revised: Mission Statement
>>> >
>>> >
>>> ><<Dubray: Which in clear gives:
>>> >The mission of the Web Services Choreography Working Group at W3C
is to
>>> >specify on the foundation of WSDL the means by which peer Web
>>> >interact, can be composed, and how the sequencing of messages among
>>> >services may be regulated to ensure conformance to
>>> >
>>> mm1: +1 except replace 'conformance to interoperability' with
>>> 'conformance and interoperability'.  This differentiates conformance
>>> a specification) for a technology vs. interoperabilility between
>>> technology solutions or implementations.
>>> Monica
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:42:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:59 UTC