Monica J. Martin wrote: > >> >> Of course you'll need to present the choreography itself and >> execution log, also expect to present e-mails, snailmail and phone >> call logs related to any escalation of the issue, whatever it takes >> to prove that things did not execute accordingly and where they went >> wrong. > > > mm1: And a reference back to the context of the economic agreement > that binds the interactions. > Again the question here: is this necessary? If under the contract I'm obliged to send someone a package do I need the FedEx slip to reference the contract? If under the contract I issue an invoice demanding payment, does the invoice need to reference the contract? Why would a choreography definition be any difference? This is just not my understanding of how the legal system works and so I don't see why back referencing is necessary in a court of law or even arbitration. Time to bring in the legal guns and see if they consider it an issue ;-) arkinReceived on Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:06:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:36:07 GMT