- From: Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 13:05:52 -0700
- To: "Monica J. Martin" <monica.martin@sun.com>
- CC: Bob Haugen <rhaugen@speakeasy.net>, public-ws-chor@w3.org
Monica J. Martin wrote: > >> >> Of course you'll need to present the choreography itself and >> execution log, also expect to present e-mails, snailmail and phone >> call logs related to any escalation of the issue, whatever it takes >> to prove that things did not execute accordingly and where they went >> wrong. > > > mm1: And a reference back to the context of the economic agreement > that binds the interactions. > Again the question here: is this necessary? If under the contract I'm obliged to send someone a package do I need the FedEx slip to reference the contract? If under the contract I issue an invoice demanding payment, does the invoice need to reference the contract? Why would a choreography definition be any difference? This is just not my understanding of how the legal system works and so I don't see why back referencing is necessary in a court of law or even arbitration. Time to bring in the legal guns and see if they consider it an issue ;-) arkin
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:06:28 UTC