W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > July 2003

Re: [ws-chor] 7/28/2003: Reqts 1.0 Comments

From: Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:36:59 -0700
Message-ID: <3F27213B.5010606@intalio.com>
To: jdart@tibco.com
CC: Monica Martin <monica.martin@sun.com>, Daniel_Austin@grainger.com, public-ws-chor@w3.org

Jon Dart wrote:

> More problematic is the proposal to use prose annotation to replace or 
> to abstract away some constructs. Specifically, the proposal to 
> "remove control logic from the cDI .. the cDI programmers would have 
> to annotate the logic with human readable statements in order to 
> explain their intent." ( IMO this is not something on which 
> we have consensus (at least not yet). In fact I think it is possibly 
> in conflict with some of the other requirements, such as D-CR-035 and 
> D-CR-038.

Agreed. If it really boils down to being a description language that is 
not machine processable, then can't we just use UML?


> --Jon
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2003 15:37:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:00 UTC