W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > July 2003

RE: Grounding Choreographies (the atoms) - WAS Simple Choreography composition suggestion

From: Fletcher, Tony <Tony.Fletcher@choreology.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:43:18 +0100
Message-ID: <221369570DEDF346AE42821041345E891956EB@exchange1.corp.choreology.com>
To: "Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, "Steve Ross-Talbot" <steve@enigmatec.net>, "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Cc: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>

+1 from Tony

Best Regards     Tony
A M Fletcher
 
Cohesions  (TM)
 
Business transaction management software for application coordination
www.choreology.com
 
Choreology Ltd., 13 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2JX     UK
Tel: +44 (0) 20 76701787   Fax: +44 (0) 20 7670 1785  Mobile: +44 (0)
7801 948219
tony.fletcher@choreology.com     (Home: amfletcher@iee.org)


-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Martin Chapman
Sent: 17 July 2003 17:17
To: Steve Ross-Talbot; Champion, Mike
Cc: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Subject: RE: Grounding Choreographies (the atoms) - WAS Simple
Choreography composition suggestion



I think there is a fundamental terminology issue here that needs to be
cleared up. An entity (avoiding any overloaded word) that sends a
message to a web service (and may expect a response depending on the
wsdl) doesn not iteslf have to be a web service. This is the most
fundamental building block. Furthermore this interaction supports an MEP
(in soap teminology) and pattern (in wsd teminology). Perosnllay if we
can not describe these meps in a choreography language we have failed,
and hence I do not think that mep choreogaprhy is any different from web
service choreography.

Martin.
Received on Friday, 18 July 2003 06:43:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:25 GMT