public-ws-chor@w3.org from December 2003 by author

Andrew Berry

• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context (Thursday, 4 December)
• Re: Convergence of Standards - Fun - Phase 2 Was: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)

Assaf Arkin

• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Saturday, 6 December)
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: Choreography semantics and WSDL (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: [wsbpel] Federated Processes and BPMS Topology (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context (Tuesday, 2 December)

Burdett, David

• RE: WS Choreography Model Overview (Monday, 8 December)
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography (Monday, 1 December)
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context (Monday, 1 December)

Champion, Mike

• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography (Wednesday, 3 December)

Edwin Khodabakchian

• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Saturday, 6 December)
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Friday, 5 December)

Gary Brown

• Comments on the model (Wednesday, 17 December)

Greg Meredith

• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)

Harvey Reed

• RE: [wsbpel] Federated Processes and BPMS Topology (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: [wsbpel] Federated Processes and BPMS Topology (Wednesday, 3 December)

Haugen Robert

• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Tuesday, 2 December)

Howard N Smith

• Defining Business Process Fusion (Wednesday, 10 December)
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Monday, 8 December)
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Monday, 8 December)
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Friday, 5 December)
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Friday, 5 December)
• Federated Processes and BPMS Topology (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Convergence of Standards - Fun - Phase 2 Was: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Fwd: Licensing lssues for Small Vendors (Tuesday, 2 December)
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Tuesday, 2 December)
• Re: New Paper available for PDF download: Workflow is just a Pi process (or WFM is not BPM) (Monday, 17 November)

JC Reddy

• RE: Defining Business Process Fusion (Wednesday, 10 December)
• Business Process Fusion (Tuesday, 9 December)
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Monday, 8 December)
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Monday, 8 December)
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Friday, 5 December)
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Friday, 5 December)
• Question about capturing states explicitly in BPEL/BPML (Thursday, 4 December)
• Canonical Business Process Examples (Wednesday, 3 December)

Jean-Jacques Dubray

• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography (Monday, 1 December)

Jeff Mischkinsky

• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography (Friday, 5 December)

Jim Hendler

• Re: WS Choreography Model Overview (Saturday, 6 December)

John Snow

• Link from translation site (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Link from translation site (Wednesday, 17 December)

marco.adragna@oxfordsociety.org

• Clarification of the Instance-Set use case. (Tuesday, 9 December)

Mark Little

• WS-CAF presentation at current face-to-face (Thursday, 18 December)
• Contribution on adding explicit transaction demarcation to the WS-Choreography language (Thursday, 18 December)

Monica J. Martin

• Re: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: Introduction section (Tuesday, 2 December)
• Re: Semantics and choreographies (Monday, 1 December)

Nickolas Kavantzas

• Re: WS Choreography Model Overview (Monday, 8 December)
• WS Choreography Model Overview (Saturday, 6 December)

Steve Ross-Talbot

• Overview comments from Steve RT (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Fwd: Issues Process (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: Why workflow is NOT just a Pi-process (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Re: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context (Monday, 1 December)

Tony Fletcher

• Editorials and comments on the requirements doc (Friday, 19 December)
• FW: WS-Chor Requirements Revised figures (Wednesday, 17 December)
• BPSS overview slides from Monica (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Contribution on adding explicit transaction demarcation to the WS-Choreography language (Monday, 15 December)

Ugo Corda

• RE: WS Choreography Model Overview (Monday, 8 December)
• RE: Question about capturing states explicitly in BPEL/BPML (Thursday, 4 December)
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography (Wednesday, 3 December)
• RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography (Wednesday, 3 December)
• Choreography semantics and WSDL (Wednesday, 3 December)

Last message date: Monday, 22 December 2003 00:38:49 UTC