RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in a context / s ematics and choreography from Champion, Mike on 2003-12-03 (public-ws-chor@w3.org from December 2003)

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:39:07 -0500
To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Message-ID: <BDD579D96530CA4BAAAD5D9549BDE779C1427E@resmsg01.sagus.com>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ugo Corda
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:31 PM
> To: Monica J. Martin; Burdett, David
> Cc: Jean-Jacques Dubray; Steve Ross-Talbot; 
> public-ws-chor@w3.org; Haugen Robert; Yunker, John; Jon Pyke
> Subject: RE: choreography & orchestration must be defined in 
> a context / s ematics and choreography
> 

> It is very easy for a W3C WG to drag the resolution of some 
> issues forever, since we strive for consensus. But let's keep 
> in mind that it is that type of behavior that in the end can 
> sink the WG.

+1  This permathread could drag WS-Chor down the way the REST permathread
dragged down WSA.

Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2003 15:44:50 UTC