Hugo Haas wrote: > Interface is PortType's new name. I am not sure that this change has > been reflected in their draft yet, but John's definition looks right. "My" definition is from the WSA glossary and should be credited to that. > Regarding service types, what happened to Sanjiva's proposal? It seems > that the name "service type" echoes the name "port type" which was > dropped for interface. There was a workable definition of service type at one point in WSDL 1.2 but it's not in the current draft. Unlike "port type", I don't think it's been renamed, just dropped. See http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-wsdl12-20030303/#changelog. If we require this, IMO the requirement needs to be fed to ws-descr. --JonReceived on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 12:39:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:36:03 GMT