W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > April 2003

RE: Minutes and actions items 15th April 2003

From: Cummins, Fred A <fred.cummins@eds.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:39:06 -0500
Message-ID: <27C20ED5A6D3D511ADF30002A5D6464802C0239C@USPLM214>
To: public-ws-chor@w3.org

I suggest that section 4.2 should be Specific Requirments.
Use Cases are already covered.  I don't believe it is 
necessary to have a use case to have a requirement, so not
all requirements are use-case based.  Section 5 covers the
relationships.

I'm not sure why there are Normative References in the
appendix since this is not a specification, i.e., nothing
in this document is normative.

Where are the requirements that were discussed at the meeting?

Fred Cummins

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Ross-Talbot [mailto:steve@enigmatec.net]
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 9:59 AM
> To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Minutes and actions items 15th April 2003
> 
> 
> 
> ACTIONS THAT NEED SOME HELP:
> 
> *	All: Review requirements document and provide feedback 
> to editors.
> 
> *	All: Everyone should read the CSF(critical success 
> factors) part of 
> the WSA spec to understand what it is about.
> 
> Could anyone in the know pls provide a uri to the WSA spec 
> that can be 
> included in teh actions of the last minutes. I think I 
> already have the 
> requirements uri but if Daniel has an update I'll include that if 
> appropriate.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Steve T
> 
> This email is confidential and may be protected by legal 
> privilege. If you are not the intended recipient,  please do 
> not copy or disclose its content but  delete the email and 
> contact the sender immediately. Whilst we run antivirus 
> software on all internet emails we are not liable for any 
> loss or damage. The recipient is advised to run their own 
> antivirus software.
> 
Received on Monday, 21 April 2003 22:39:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:58 UTC