Re: Progressive Concreteness of Choreography binding

From: Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 10:37:18 -0800 Message-ID: <3E8C7F5E.8010406@intalio.com> To: Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com> CC: public-ws-chor@w3.org · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:14 GMT

Ricky Ho wrote:

>
> Assaf,
>
> Thinking more about the XSL/T approach.  I think the AbstractPO 
> doesn't need to be xsd:Any.  It can just be the following ...
>
> <complexType name="AbstractPO">
>         <element name="shippingAddress" type="Address"/>
>         <element name="totalAmount" type="xsd:float"/>
> </complexType>
>
> Because you can use a handcode XSL/T to transform any concrete PO 
> (even EDI) to the above structure.

+1

arkin

>
> Rgds, Ricky
>