FW: Last Call Issue: WORKUNIT REPETITION

From: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:50:33 -0000 To: <public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org> Message-ID: <00a201c4f723$be0aee80$0901a8c0@ie.oracle.com> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:10 GMT

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gary Brown
Sent: 05 January 2005 14:19
To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Subject: Last Call Issue: WORKUNIT REPETITION

Suggestion from Kohei based on his analysis of the workunit semantics
for repetition:

> 
> We therefore believe it is better to have two workunits, one for
non-repeating,
> and another for repeating. If this is too radical, then we recommend
not to have
> two conditions, but to differentiate between repeating and
non-repeating by:
> 
> repeat = true|false 

Regards
Gary and Steve