FW: Last Call Issue: WORKUNIT REPETITION

 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gary Brown
Sent: 05 January 2005 14:19
To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Subject: Last Call Issue: WORKUNIT REPETITION


Suggestion from Kohei based on his analysis of the workunit semantics
for repetition:

> 
> We therefore believe it is better to have two workunits, one for
non-repeating,
> and another for repeating. If this is too radical, then we recommend
not to have
> two conditions, but to differentiate between repeating and
non-repeating by:
> 
> repeat = true|false 

Regards
Gary and Steve