W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org > August 2005

Re: W3C WS-Choreo WG - Issue 973

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:57:19 +0200
To: "Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
Cc: <public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <42fa2b7d.74620921@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Martin Chapman wrote:
>I solicited feedback from the WG on this issue and this email seem to
>sum up the groups position:
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Aug/0007.html

Would it be possible to define the extension conformance requirements
indirectly through conformance requirements for implementations? For
example,

  Implementations of extensions MUST ...
  Extensions that require implementations to violate the requirement
  above are not allowed.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2005 14:57:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:10 GMT