* Martin Chapman wrote: >Well I can define an extension called "foo" and in the description of >foo it could redefine the semantics of something in the cdl namespace. >For example "foo should be used instead of perform and its behaviour is >not to invoke the indicated choreography". This would not be allowed as >it contradicts the specs definition of perform. Okay, so, let's say I create a XML DSig extension where an ds:Signature element is added as last child of cdl:choreography. Implementations of this extension are required to ignore the cdl:choreography element if the Signature is not valid. This would seem to contradict the semantics of the cdl:choreography element since implementations are not allowed to ignore it under these conditions. So making such a XML DSig extension is not allowed. Correct? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2005 20:09:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:10 GMT