W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org > August 2005

RE: W3C WS-Choreo WG - Issue 959

From: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:10:39 +0100
To: "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: <public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006501c59835$2205c7e0$0901a8c0@ie.oracle.com>


We have followed the pattern used by our sibling WS Working Groups
(xmlp, wd wg, ws-addr), and at 
our meeting yesterday we agreed not to change it for the time being:
We will however raise this at the next WS Coordination Group meeting.

I hope this is satisfactory.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] 
>Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 7:59 PM
>To: Martin Chapman
>Cc: public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org
>Subject: Re: W3C WS-Choreo WG - Issue 959
>* Martin Chapman wrote:
>>There are different Styles of namespace names in use within W3C.
>Yes, I am saying that's not a good thing and should be 
>changed. I don't see a good reason why the Web Services 
>Choreography Description Language shouldn't have a namespace 
>name as short and as easy memorize than the namespace of 
>XHTML, XLink, SVG, etc.
>Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · 
>http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · >Telefon: 
>+49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim 
>· PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:10:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:46:25 UTC