W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org > August 2005

Re: W3C WS-Choreo WG - Issue 964

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:52:41 +0200
To: "Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
Cc: public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <43056c2e.399496625@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Martin Chapman wrote:
>The document [2] does contain a table in section 1.1 that defines all
>namespace prefixes. 
>At our meeting on 11th January 2005 [3], the workgroup therefore
>unanimously agreed to close this 
>issue without change.

>[1]http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=964

I am not sure the Working Group really understood the issue, the
apparently complete examples do something like this:

  <?xml version='1.0'?>
  <element xpath='cdl:example(...)' />

How is the XPath engine supposed to know about the 'cdl' prefix?
What would happen for something like

  <?xml version='1.0'?>
  <element xmlns:cdl='... not cdl ...' xpath='cdl:example(...)' />

is this still a reference to a cdl function? What if

  <?xml version='1.0'?>
  <element xmlns:foo='http://www.w3.org/2004/12/ws-chor/cdl'
    xpath='foo:example(...)' />

is this a reference to a cdl function? None of this is currently
defined in the draft as far as I can tell. The prefix table is
fine, but the apparently complete examples in the draft are not
guranteed to work as advertized without clearer conformance re-
quirements. I think the XML Query / XSL Working Groups should
review the use of XPath in the document, I am happy to defer to
them on this issue.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 18:55:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:10 GMT