public-ws-async-tf@w3.org from February 2005 by author

Amelia A Lewis

Re: Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties? (Monday, 7 February)

Anish Karmarkar

Re: Usecase 4: Asynch req-res -- polling style (Monday, 21 February)
Re: Usecase 4: Asynch req-res -- polling style (Monday, 21 February)
Re: Point of view in operation descriptions. (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Usecase 4: Asynch req-res -- polling style (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Use case 3 (Wednesday, 16 February)
Usecase 4: Asynch req-res -- polling style (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Use case 3 (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Agenda: 2005-02-08 Async TF telcon (Wednesday, 9 February)
Re: Scoping multi-transport / async bindings for WSDL (Wednesday, 9 February)
Re: HTTP based async request-response (Wednesday, 2 February)
Re: HTTP based async request-response (Wednesday, 2 February)

Asir Vedamuthu

RE: Agenda: 2005-02-08 Async TF telcon (Wednesday, 9 February)
RE: Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties? (Monday, 7 February)
RE: Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties? (Monday, 7 February)

David Hull

Trusting callback endpoints (Wednesday, 23 February)
Re: Usecase 4: Asynch req-res -- polling style (Tuesday, 22 February)
Re: Usecase 4: Asynch req-res -- polling style (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Additional use case: 7 "Reversed HTTP binding for SOAP". (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Use case 6 (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Point of view in operation descriptions. (Wednesday, 16 February)
Point of view in operation descriptions. (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Usecase 4: Asynch req-res -- polling style (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Use case 3 (Wednesday, 16 February)
Re: Use case 6 (Tuesday, 15 February)
Re: Scoping multi-transport / async bindings for WSDL (Friday, 11 February)
Use case 6 (Friday, 11 February)
Async use cases (Wednesday, 9 February)

Glen Daniels

Breakfast tomorrow (Monday, 28 February)
Summary of decision tree for Addr/Desc groups (Friday, 25 February)
Agenda: 2005-02-23 Async TF telcon (Tuesday, 22 February)
DRAFT minutes from 2005-02-16 telcon (Tuesday, 22 February)
RE: Use case 6 (Tuesday, 15 February)
Use Case #2, sync req-resp over the same connection (Tuesday, 15 February)
Agenda: 2005-02-16 Async TF telcon (Tuesday, 15 February)
REMINDER : Action Items re: Use Cases (Tuesday, 15 February)
RE: Use case 6 (Tuesday, 15 February)
RE: Minutes of the 2005-02-09 teleconference (Thursday, 10 February)
RE: Scoping multi-transport / async bindings for WSDL (Wednesday, 9 February)
Agenda: 2005-02-08 Async TF telcon (Tuesday, 8 February)
Scoping multi-transport / async bindings for WSDL (Tuesday, 8 February)

Hugo Haas

Minutes of the 2005-02-09 teleconference (Thursday, 10 February)
Re: HTTP based async request-response (Thursday, 3 February)
Re: Initial thoughts on wire level messages (and bindings) (Wednesday, 2 February)

Jonathan Marsh

RE: Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties? (Wednesday, 9 February)
RE: Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties? (Wednesday, 9 February)

Liu, Kevin

RE: Summary of decision tree for Addr/Desc groups (Friday, 25 February)
RE: Use case 3 (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Use case 1 - one way (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Use case 6 (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Use case 1 - one way (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Scoping multi-transport / async bindings for WSDL (Tuesday, 8 February)
RE: Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties? (Monday, 7 February)
Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties? (Monday, 7 February)
Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties? (Monday, 7 February)
RE: Initial thoughts on wire level messages (and bindings) (Wednesday, 2 February)

Marc Hadley

Re: Use case 1 - one way (Wednesday, 16 February)
Use case 1 - one way (Tuesday, 15 February)
Re: HTTP based async request-response (Thursday, 3 February)
Re: HTTP based async request-response (Thursday, 3 February)
Re: HTTP based async request-response (Thursday, 3 February)
Re: HTTP based async request-response (Thursday, 3 February)
Re: HTTP based async request-response (Wednesday, 2 February)
HTTP based async request-response (Wednesday, 2 February)

Mark Nottingham

Minutes of the 2005-02-02 teleconference (Wednesday, 2 February)
Agenda: 2004-02-01 WS-Async TF teleconference (Tuesday, 1 February)

michael.eder@nokia.com

RE: Usecase 4: Asynch req-res -- polling style (Thursday, 17 February)
RE: Additional use case: 7 "Reversed HTTP binding for SOAP". (Wednesday, 16 February)
Additional use case: 7 "Reversed HTTP binding for SOAP". (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: HTTP based async request-response (Thursday, 3 February)
RE: HTTP based async request-response (Thursday, 3 February)
RE: HTTP based async request-response (Thursday, 3 February)

Rich Salz

Re: HTTP based async request-response (Thursday, 3 February)
Re: HTTP based async request-response (Thursday, 3 February)

Roberto Chinnici

Re: Use case 3 (Wednesday, 16 February)
Use case 3 (Tuesday, 15 February)

Simon J. Hernandez

Mailing list failures: explanation and possible fix (Friday, 4 February)

Ugo Corda

RE: Use case 3 (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Point of view in operation descriptions. (Wednesday, 16 February)
Use case similar to #6, but sync/async decision is made at deployment time, not run-time (Wednesday, 9 February)
RE: HTTP based async request-response (Wednesday, 2 February)
RE: HTTP based async request-response (Wednesday, 2 February)

Yalcinalp, Umit

RE: Use case 3 (Wednesday, 16 February)
Use case 5 (Wednesday, 16 February)
RE: Initial thoughts on WSDL2.0 LC101 - do we need message level binding properties? (Wednesday, 9 February)
RE: Agenda: 2004-02-01 WS-Async TF teleconference (Wednesday, 2 February)

Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2005 20:37:35 UTC