W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-async-tf@w3.org > April 2005

Re: Proposed issue text

From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 13:07:39 -0700
Message-ID: <425AD90B.3010006@oracle.com>
To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, public-ws-async-tf@w3.org

Glen Daniels wrote:
> Hi Anish:
>>>P.S.  With regard to the MEP list above, I assume we also 
>>want to add
>>>Robust-In-Only to the WSDL 2.0 list.  Also, do we want to 
>>say anything
>>>about using MAPs as the "secret sauce" enabling Out-Only 
>>and its ilk?
>>Since, MAPs are in the SOAP message (typically), I'm not sure how it 
>>helps enabling out-only. Don't things like SOAP-Response MEP and the 
>>corresponding HTTP binding fit the bill here better than MAPs?
> Only for the "pull-like" cases.  In many cases, I expect that MAPs (or
> at least EPRs :)) will be used to transfer something like a
> "notificationsTo" address in an interaction prior to the
> server-initiated one(s).  Thus MAPs provide a convenient way to ground
> the "magic" without going so far as to specify exactly how it's done for
> your application.  I just think we should mention that they can be a
> useful tool for these cases.

Got it.

Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 20:11:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:48:42 UTC