W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Examples to Resolve Issue LC136

From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 11:55:28 -0400
Message-ID: <4649D7F0.1060709@tibco.com>
To: tom@coastin.com
CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org

Sorry for the delay.  In case it wasn't clear from the call, that's
exactly my point.

The result in your example 2 is just

addressing non-anon with jabber
addressing non-anon

So I know explicitly that jabber is available, but I don't know
explicitly that mailto is or http is.  The required answer in this case is

addressing non-anon with jabber
addressing non-anon with mailto
addressing non-anon with http
(addressing with non-anon could also appear, I suppose)

however that happens to be realized in angle brackets.

Tom Rutt wrote:
> I would like to clarify that in the second example
> addressing non-anon
> addressing non-anon with Jabber
> addressing non-anon with http
> is different than
> addressing non-anon
> because the prior idicates that jabber and http are explicity available
> The non-anon only gives no such assurances.
> tom
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 16:00:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:16 UTC