Supposedly, if the client knows about RM it also knows about the RM anon URI as well and what it implies wrt the use of the backchannel, so I really don't see the difference. Paco David Hull <dmh@tibco.com> Sent by: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org 10/23/2006 05:35 PM To "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org> cc Subject Who knows what from where? Pursuant to CR33: If I'm a client and I know about WS-RM, and the server says "I support WS-RM and you can use 'http://.../RMAnon.*' in a response endpoint", then I know immediately that I can use this facility. If the server says "I support WS-RM and I can send responses on the backchannel", then I need to know, from somewhere, that "backchannel" in this case is referring to the special WS-RM URI family. Where would this information appear?Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2006 14:39:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:15 GMT