W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Comparing IRIs: anon and none

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:57:18 -0500
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-id: <1EEAD7D1-AB4D-4AF1-A93E-8399271BEEB5@Sun.COM>
But you'd never get a message sent to "none" since any message  
addressed to an EPR with and [address] of "none" isn't sent. Maybe  
this needs to be generalized to talk about [address] of EPRs instead ?

Marc.

On Mar 13, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Jonathan Marsh wrote:

> Section 3.2.1 states:
>
>
>
> Comparison of [destination] property values is out of scope, other  
> than using simple string comparison to detect whether the value is  
> anonymous, that is, where [destination] has the value "http:// 
> www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous".
>
>
>
> I don’t believe this changed when we added the “none” URI, though  
> it probably should have.  A complete solution would allow both anon  
> and none URIs to be detected through simple string comparison:
>
>
>
> Comparison of [destination] property values is out of scope, other  
> than using simple string comparison to detect whether the value is  
> anonymous, that is, where [destination] has one of the  
> values"http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous" or “http:// 
> www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/none”.
>
>
>
> This is unfortunately probably related to the implementation of a  
> LC issue rather than a CR one.
>
>
>
>  [  Jonathan Marsh  ][  jmarsh@microsoft.com  ][  http:// 
> spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes  ]
>
>
>
>

---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.




Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 20:57:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:12 GMT