W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2006

Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go?

From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:56:01 -0500
To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-id: <4415A421.5010006@tibco.com>
Glen Daniels wrote:

>>The latest editors' draft says:
>>
>>	The faults defined in this section are generated if the 
>>condition stated in the preamble in each subsection is met. 
>>They are sent to the [fault endpoint], if present and valid. 
>>Otherwise they are sent to the [reply endpoint] if present. 
>>If neither is present faults may be sent to the [source endpoint].
>>    
>>
>
>It does?  I don't see this in today's:
>
>http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr-soap.html
>?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
>  
>
It did, when I sent the message.  It doesn't any more, though.  I was
surprised to see it, particularly since the fallback to [source
endpoint] was something that, as I recall, had been floated and
rejected.  At any rate, I just followed the link on the home page, read,
cut and pasted.

>  
>
>>I think this text would mostly answer the question of "where 
>>do faults go" in this particular case (but if wsa:ReplyTo is 
>>present but invalid and wsa:From is missing or invalid, do we 
>>revert to anonymous?).
>>    
>>
>
>I agree this would help a lot.  I still think the clarifications I
>suggested might be useful, but this text would substantially resolve my
>issue.
>
>--Glen
>
>  
>
Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 16:56:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:12 GMT