W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2006

RE: ISSUE: Where do faults go?

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:49:16 -0500
Message-ID: <80A43FC052CE3949A327527DCD5D6B2701986868@MAIL01.bedford.progress.com>
To: "David Hull" <dmh@tibco.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

> The latest editors' draft says:
> 	The faults defined in this section are generated if the 
> condition stated in the preamble in each subsection is met. 
> They are sent to the [fault endpoint], if present and valid. 
> Otherwise they are sent to the [reply endpoint] if present. 
> If neither is present faults may be sent to the [source endpoint].

It does?  I don't see this in today's:


> I think this text would mostly answer the question of "where 
> do faults go" in this particular case (but if wsa:ReplyTo is 
> present but invalid and wsa:From is missing or invalid, do we 
> revert to anonymous?).

I agree this would help a lot.  I still think the clarifications I
suggested might be useful, but this text would substantially resolve my

Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 16:50:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:13 UTC