W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > July 2006

Re: SOAPAction and Default Action

From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:41:53 -0700
Message-ID: <44C030E1.4060608@oracle.com>
To: pyendluri@webmethods.com
CC: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>, W3C WS-Addressing Public List <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

Prasad,

I tend to think the exact opposite. An empty string is a value, so I 
tend to think of #2 as having specified the SOAPAction value.

-Anish
--

Prasad Yendluri wrote:
> Hi Arun,
> 
> Since it says "where a SOAPAction _value _is specified",  I tend to 
> think it covers #2 also, as a value had not been specified for 
> SOAPAction, considering empty string is not a "value". I agree however 
> that it would be clearer to exclude SOAPAction empty string case explicitly.
> 
> Regards,
> Prasad
> 
> Arun Gupta wrote:
>>
>> Section 4.4.1 of WSDL Binding [1] says:
>>
>> -- cut here --
>> In the absence of a wsaw:Action attribute on a WSDL input element 
>> where a SOAPAction value is specified, the value of the [action] 
>> property for the input message is the value of the SOAPAction specified.
>> -- cut here --
>>
>> Consider the following 3 different SOAP bindings for an operation in 
>> WSDL 1.1:
>>
>> 1). <soap:operation soapAction="bindingSOAPAction"/>
>>
>> 2). <soap:operation soapAction=""/>
>>
>> 3). <soap:operation/>
>>
>> In 1)., SOAPAction is clearly specified. In 3). SOAPAction is clearly 
>> not specified. Should 2). be considered as specified or not specified ?
>>
>> A literal reading of the spec will mean that SOAPAction is specified, 
>> even though blank. I've seen 2). as a more common style in WSDLs. If 
>> there happens to more than one operation in a portType (not uncommon 
>> at all) and all the operation use 2)., then all the operations will 
>> have exactly same wsa:Action within a portType.
>>
>> I think the wording of the spec should be changed to specify that only 
>> a non-empty SOAPAction overrides the default Action.
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-ws-addr-wsdl-20060529/#explicitaction
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Arun
Received on Friday, 21 July 2006 01:42:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:13 GMT