Looks good, Dave. Volcanoes averted! Actually, there's one comment that I should have made earlier. This document doesn't prescribe a complete binding, just an extension to other bindings (as you note by the use of the word "refinement" in the abstract). I'd suggest changing the title to "binding extension", or something similar. Cheers, Mark. On 1/23/06, David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> wrote: > > > > Here's a request optional response binding for status code 202: > > > > Dave > -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.comReceived on Monday, 23 January 2006 19:44:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT