W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2006

RE: i68 and i69 proposal for WSDL doc

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:45:08 -0800
Message-ID: <E16EB59B8AEDF445B644617E3C1B3C9C5375DA@repbex01.amer.bea.com>
To: "WS-Addressing" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Ooops, please disregard.  

 

________________________________

From: David Orchard 
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:44 PM
To: WS-Addressing
Subject: i68 and i69 proposal for WSDL doc

 

Here's a proposal for how the WSDL binding doc would refer to external
documents.  I had to really really squint hard to convince myself that
"Indicating use of WS-Addressing" is the right section for soap
binding/mep changes..  I mean, really really really hard.  

 

3.4 Non-anonymous indicated

This section describes the Message Exchange Patterns and binding changes
when WS-Addressing is indicated.

3.4.1 SOAP 1.1/HTTP binding

 

WS-Addressing changes the SOAP 1.1/HTTP binding when the value of the
response endpoint EPR contains an address that is different than the
anonymous URI.  In this case, the receiver of a message MUST respond
with a 202 status code and an empty HTTP body, aka no SOAP envelope.  If
the value of the response endpoint EPR contains an address that is
different than the anonymous URI, the outbound message MUST be sent
using a separate connection using the address value of the specified by
appropriate response endpoint 

 

3.4.2 SOAP 1.2 binding

 

When the value of the response endpoint EPR contains the anonymous
address, then the inbound and any outbound message are part of a single
SOAP request-response MEP [soap 1.2 adjuncts ref].  When the value of
the response endpoint EPR does not contain the anonymous address, then
any outbound message is not part of the mep that the inbound message is
in.

 
Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 20:45:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT