W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2006

i067 and i068 proposal: update WSDL binding document

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:31:13 -0800
Message-ID: <E16EB59B8AEDF445B644617E3C1B3C9C3B503B@repbex01.amer.bea.com>
To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Here's some proposed text for the WSDL binding document if it is chosen
for the location of the one-way soap bindings.  I show two alternative
wordings in the soap 1.1 section, which would equally apply for the soap
1.2 section.

 

3.4 SOAP 1.1/HTTP binding

 

WS-Addressing changes the SOAP 1.1/HTTP binding when the (anonymous
address is not used | value of the response endpoint EPR contains an
address that is different than the anonymous URI).  In this case, the
receiver of a message MUST respond with a 202 status code and an empty
HTTP body, aka no SOAP envelope.  If (a non-anonymous address is used |
value of the response endpoint EPR contains an address that is different
than the anonymous URI), the outbound message MUST be sent using a
separate connection using the address value of the specified by
appropriate response endpoint 

 

3.5 SOAP 1.2 binding

 

When the anonymous address is used, then the inbound and any outbound
message are part of a single SOAP request-response MEP [soap 1.2
adjuncts ref].  When the anonymous address is not used, then any
outbound message is not part of the mep that the inbound message is in.

 
Received on Monday, 9 January 2006 20:32:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT