W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

RE: Clarification for WS-RX

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 08:27:03 -0800
Message-ID: <E16EB59B8AEDF445B644617E3C1B3C9CC92C07@repbex01.amer.bea.com>
To: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <dmh@tibco.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

OTOH, the last thing I want is some profile to crop up that "fixes" for
WS-RX how "broken" WS-A is.  At the end of the day, the stuff is
supposed to be composable, etc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> paul.downey@bt.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 6:09 AM
> To: dmh@tibco.com; public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Clarification for WS-RX
> > I'm a bit loath to send this to the whole WS-RX list, and I think 
> > there are enough WS-RXperts here to answer, so ...
> but this is Web service addressing and I'm bothered that we 
> do seem to keep descending into glorious detail on how WS-RX 
> may or may not work, rather than answering tractable LC and 
> CR comments from that WG wrt our specifications.
> Paul
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 16:28:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:13 UTC