W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

Re: Contradiction in WSDL Binding

From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:27:28 +0100
To: "Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-ID: <20060221182728.GB29937@w3.org>
* Rogers, Tony <Tony.Rogers@ca.com> [2006-02-21 21:23+1100]
> I happened to be reading the WSDL Binding - you know, as one does. 
> Noticed a tiny contradiction between Example 4-7 "Structure of default wsa:Action IRI for faults", which specifies the presence of a delimiter between the operation name and the literal string "Fault", and Example 4-8 "Example WSDL...", which shows a fault action without that delimiter.
> Fix is either to eliminate the delimiter specified in Example 4-7, or to add the delimiter in Example 4-8 - the latter is the simpler change. It means the fault action would become:
> http://example.com/stockquote/StockQuotePortType/GetLastTradePrice/Fault/Error
> Should we raise this as a CR issue? Or call it editorial licence?

If there is room for discussion, I would raise a Last Call issue. As a
general rule of thumb, we should IMO avoid changing drafts without
having an issue associated with the change in order to avoid



Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/

Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2006 18:27:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:13 UTC