W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal

From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:58:43 +0100
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-ID: <20060217175842.GC9429@w3.org>
* Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com> [2006-02-16 13:16-0800]
> My 2c - this change isn't cost-effective.
> I'm worried about any change to the specs at this stage because of the
> general concern of unintended side-effects as we're trying to lock down
> interop results.  This change isn't directly motivated by results of the
> interop work, so it's not essential to address.  The status quo
> functions perfectly well, despite the aesthetic concerns which appear to
> be addressable only at the expense of whatever simplicity we have left.

I agree with Jonathan.

It is unwise so late in the game to try and fix a small problem with a
proposal larger than what is needed, however attractive the proposal

> Therefore my preference is to close CR20 with no action.

I'd prefer we add the clarifying text from Paul[1], which seems to
clear up the confusion which was pointed out in the interop testing,
and is essentially the status quo.



  1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Feb/0061.html
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/

Received on Friday, 17 February 2006 17:58:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:13 UTC