W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

Re: CR20 proposal (consistent wording)

From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:07:44 -0500
To: Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
Message-id: <43F02230.6040903@tibco.com>
Francisco Curbera wrote:

>As I said in my earlier mail, this would be the text to include in section
>3.5:
>
>"When the HTTP transport is in use, the anonymous URI is only used to
>indicate the use of the HTTP reply channel so it can only appear as the
>value of the [destination] property in reply messages."
>  
>
To be more concrete (insertions in italics):

3.5 Use of Anonymous Address in SOAP

3.5.1 SOAP 1.1/HTTP

When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is specified  
for the response endpoint then there is no change to the SOAP 1.1/ 
HTTP binding./ The URI 
"http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" MUST NOT be specified
for the [destination] property of an HTTP message, except when required
as a result of the rules in section 3.4 of the core.
/
3.5.2 SOAP 1.2

When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is specified  
for the response endpoint and the request is the request part of a  
SOAP request-response MEP [soap 1.2 adjuncts ref], then any response  
MUST be the response part of the same SOAP request-response MEP [soap  
1.2 adjuncts ref].  /The URI 
"http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" MUST NOT be specified
for the [destination] property of any message in a SOAP request-response
MEP//, except when required as a result of the rules in section 3.4 of
the core//.
/

This could be sharpened by saying the server/receiver MUST fault on
receiving a message with such a [destination], instead of saying that
such a [destination] MUST NOT be used but not saying what happens if it
is.//

>Paco
>
>
>
>                                                                                                                                         
>                      David Hull                                                                                                         
>                      <dmh@tibco.com>                 To:       Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS                                       
>                      Sent by:                        cc:       public-ws-addressing@w3.org                                              
>                      public-ws-addressing-req        Subject:  Re: CR20 proposal                                                        
>                      uest@w3.org                                                                                                        
>                                                                                                                                         
>                                                                                                                                         
>                      02/12/2006 02:22 PM                                                                                                
>                                                                                                                                         
>
>
>
>
>
>Francisco Curbera wrote:
>
>  
>
>>As per Bob's request, and for easier reference, this is a more detailed
>>version of the proposal for closing CR20 that we discussed on the last
>>call:
>>
>>Middle of the road approach: retain the defaulting of the To header to
>>anonymous, but re-state (in section 3.2 of the Core spec) that the use of
>>the anonymous URI in the destination field is actually dependent on the
>>interpretation that the transport binding gives to the anonymous URI. Add
>>    
>>
>a
>  
>
>>note in Section 3.5 of the SOAP spec indicating that for the case of the
>>HTTP transport the anonymous URI is only used to indicate the use of the
>>HTTP reply channel so it can only be used in reply messages.
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>Could you please state this in the form of an amendment to the text
>accepted for section 3.5 in the resolution to CR 15 [1]?  While this
>text has not yet been incorporated into the editors' draft yet, I
>believe it represents the latest draft of that section.
>
>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Jan/0085
>
>  
>
>>Paco
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 06:07:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT