W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

Re: WSA From

From: Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 13:25:52 +0000
Message-ID: <43E9F160.5070403@jboss.com>
To: Paul Fremantle <pzfreo@gmail.com>
CC: "Cahill, Conor P" <conor.p.cahill@intel.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org

If it's optional, why not have it as a full-blown EPR anyway? To be 
honest, I'd also be happy with something rather than nothing, but I'd be 
interested in knowing reasons for URI rather than EPR.

Mark.


Paul Fremantle wrote:
> I guess there may be times when a client wants to include a policy or 
> other information. But I will be happy with any kind of identifier.
>
> Paul
>
> On 2/8/06, * Cahill, Conor P* <conor.p.cahill@intel.com 
> <mailto:conor.p.cahill@intel.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     If <From> is going to be present, why isn't it simply an xs:anyURI
>     rather than a wsa:EPR since it doesn't impact message flow
>     and thus the expanded capabilities of an EPR are perhaps
>     overkill.
>
>     Conor
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle 
> <http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle>
> paul@wso2.com <mailto:paul@wso2.com>
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com <http://www.wso2.com>
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2006 13:25:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT