W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases

From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:39:46 -0800
Message-ID: <43E7FA62.7060104@oracle.com>
To: paul.downey@bt.com
CC: dmh@tibco.com, public-ws-addressing@w3.org

Yes, using HTTP 'Post'.

-Anish
--

paul.downey@bt.com wrote:
> 
> and this is using HTTP "POST" and not some new "TUNNEL" 
> or "CHANNEL" verb, right?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org on behalf of Anish Karmarkar
> Sent: Mon 2/6/2006 9:04 PM
> To: David Hull
> Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases
>  
> 
> There is also another case:
> 
>    * I send you a message.
>    * You don't ack it immediately, but instead just send an empty 202.
>    * I send you another message
>    * You send me WS-RX acks for the previous message. But the ack header 
> does not acknowledge the current message.
> 
> -Anish
> --
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 01:40:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT