W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:10:43 -0500
Message-ID: <c70bc85d0602031410q39e53a32sdf941fe467c1664f@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org

In the scenario under discussion, does the client understand that it's
dealing with a queue and therefore always expects the 202?  Or does
the client think it's interacting with a "service" and therefore the
202 indicates - after the fact - the exceptional condition that the
service actually behaved like a queue for that exchange?

If the former, then 200 could be used as a response code instead of
202, since if the client knew it was a queue then the "result of
processing" would be the result of processing by the queue.

Mark.
Received on Friday, 3 February 2006 22:10:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT