W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > August 2006

Re: [ws-rx] Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:14:47 -0400
Message-ID: <c70bc85d0608090714j264c4d98n49b5db536d43b05e@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Christopher B Ferris" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Alastair Green" <alastair.green@choreology.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org, ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org

On 8/9/06, Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Alistair,
>
>
> > If you say there is no reply, then you are saying: don't send a
>  > response.
>
> Again, the SOAP-level is distinct from the transfer/transport-level. They
> are NOT at all related.
> It is only that many assume that they are, when in fact, they are not.

The default SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding makes no distinction between "SOAP
level" and "underlying protocol level"; from its POV, it's all one big
happy level.  HTTP responses are SOAP responses.

Mark.
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 14:15:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:14 GMT