W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > September 2005

Re: Reference Parameters - using them

From: Pete Hendry <peter.hendry@capeclear.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:36:35 +1200
Message-ID: <433BEDE3.7070006@capeclear.com>
To: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org


Good to know I'm not the only one thinking this. The problem I see is 
the usefulness of AddressingParameters is seriously degraded in the 
current design. I see almost no useful scenarios for their use in their 
current state. I'm sure people can come up with plenty that they may use 
them for, but as I said the most common case (I'd go so far as to say 
that it is probably the main use I would have for them) is not supported 
which is a big loss.

Pete

Marc Hadley wrote:

> On Sep 28, 2005, at 7:35 PM, Pete Hendry wrote:
>
>>
>> Related to David's examples for i057, I was wondering about what I  
>> would consider the most common use-case for reference parameters -  
>> the server wanting the client to return context in the next  request. 
>> It seems to me the current design of reference parameters  are only 
>> useful for
>>
>> a) fixed value data - i.e. not session-like data
>> b) the client asking the server to pass back information using the  
>> replyTo header
>>
>> Consider the (common?) scenario where a client logs into a server.  
>> The server then creates a "session" in which it has customerKey and  
>> shoppingCartId values it wants the client to pass back in each  
>> subsequent request. These are opaque as the client does not have to  
>> know what the customerId or shoppingCartId are to work, it just has  
>> to include them as-is. ReferenceParameters seem the ideal vehicle  
>> for this but where would the server specify these parameters?
>
>
> This is the kind of use case I had in mind when I raised issue 15[1],  
> the group didn't want to go there and we settled on pointing to WS- 
> Context instead[2]. Mebbe we need to add something to the  
> specification along these lines rather than just in the issue  
> resolution in the issues list ?
>
> Marc.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/#i015
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Jan/ 
> 0180
>
>
>> They are not fixed values and will change for each "conversation"  so 
>> they cannot just be specified in the WSDL with fixed values.  They 
>> have to be parameterized somehow to allow the server to set  the 
>> actual session values and pass them to the client to be  included in 
>> the next request.
>>
>> Is this beyond the scope of reference parameters? In (my  
>> understanding of) their current form they are of little use. It is  
>> unlikely you would want to publish fixed values within parameters  in 
>> WSDL (or any other static mechanism) and less likely that the  client 
>> would start the session information that could be contained  within 
>> them.
>>
>> Pete
>>
>>
>
> ---
> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
>
>
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2005 13:36:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:09 GMT