Just as we did for the Core and SOAP Binding documents, I'd like to review the WSDL Binding-related requirements that are expressed in our charter, to ensure that we're ready to progress when we close our last WSDL-related issue. As I read it, the WSDL-specific requirements therein, along with how we fulfil them (or fail to) are: "B. The use of these abstract message properties in the context of all WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0 Message Exchange Patterns..." -- see Section 4, WS-Addressing and WSDL Message Exchange Patterns. "... including the asynchronous use of these MEPs." -- see i059 "[T]he relationship between message properties and WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 service descriptions will be provided if applicable." -- Not sure; does Section 4 address this adequately? "WSDL 1.1 bindings must include language that the bindings are defined for backward compatibility only." -- see Section 1, Introduction. Is this statement strong enough? "[Provide] the mechanisms for defining Web Services Addressing property values in WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 service descriptions." -- see i056, i057, i058. Any thoughts or additions would be welcome. -- Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist Office of the CTO BEA Systems ________________________________________________________________________________ BEAWorld 2005: coming to a city near you. Everything you need for SOA and enterprise infrastructure success. Register now at http://www.bea.com/4beaworld Santa Clara 27-29 Sep| London 11-12 Oct| Paris13-14 Oct| Prague18-19 Oct |Tokyo 25-26 Oct| Beijing 7-8 DecReceived on Thursday, 22 September 2005 23:55:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:29 GMT