W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > September 2005

Comments on WSDL adjuncts part 2

From: Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 09:11:12 -0700
Message-ID: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D105C5FAA3@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Here are the issues I found with the WSDL 2.0 Part 2 Adjuncts. These are
all typos. I did not find any issues with WS-Addressing. I will point
out some relevant sections others may want to look at to see if I missed



Section 2, first paragraph after note: "define the sequence and of
abstract messages" should be "define the sequence of abstract messages"

Section 5.10.1: "ond" should be "and"

Section 5.11.2: "extension of the 5." should be either "extension of 5."
or "extension of section 5."

"patterns defined in 2." should be "patterns defined in section 2" 

"patterns defined in 6." should be "patterns defined in section 6.6" 

Section 5.9.1: "it is permissible for specification interaction to
engage" is very strange wording. I don't really have an alternative but
wanted to call attention to it.

Section 6.3 first note after table 6-1: "stype" should be "type"


WS-Addressing relevant sections:

Section 2.2 Fault Propagation rules: Direct reference to WS-Addressing
Core in saying that WSA FaultTo addresses trump rules defined in WSDL
MEPs (sounds right to me)

Section 5.8 Binding: Value of SOAP Action Feature is defined as being
related to Binding Operations and MEPs. No mention is made of WSA
interaction which may be an oversight.

Section 5.11.3 Default Binding rules: Default values of SOAP Action
Feature are defined with no mention is made of WSA interaction which may
be an oversight.


This should complete my AI from 8/29.



Marc g


Received on Saturday, 10 September 2005 06:10:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:11 UTC