W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > October 2005

RE: Comments from WS-A on WSDL 2.0 documents

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 14:09:36 -0700
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E849E1FD@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
as a Last Call comment LC346 [1].  The Working Group agreed to fix the
problems as detailed in-line below.

If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
satisfies your concern.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC346

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Rogers, Tony
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 5:05 PM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Comments from WS-A on WSDL 2.0 documents
> 
> These are the comments I have on the WSDL 2.0 Primer, per the request
> that the WS-Addressing WG review the WSDL 2.0 documents
>
> 1. Typos:
>  a. section 2.3 third para, first line: "either imported nor inlined"
> should be "either imported or inlined".
>  b. section 2.4.4.1 last para under third bullet "provides examples
> for the URI style and Multipart style" should be "provides examples
> for the IRI style and Multipart style"
>  c. section 5.1 second para: "The context that a Web service may be
> deployed" should probably be: "The context in which a Web service may
> be deployed".

The WG directed the editors to adopt these editorial improvements.

> 2. Section 5.3 contains repeated use of the term "endpoint reference"
> in a sense which is not a WS-A EPR. It would be wise, particularly
> given the references in 5.2 to WS-A, to make it very clear that the
> endpoint reference described in 5.3 is not an End Point Reference. Or
> maybe a different term would be better? Something like "endpoint URL"
> perhaps?

The WG directed the editors to use alternate terminology.  "References
to endpoints" was a favorite alternative of the WG.

> 3. WS Addressing is not included in the References, despite being
> mentioned in section 5.2.

The WG directed the editors to add such a reference.

> Tony Rogers
> Computer Associates
> Senior Architect
> tel +61 3 9727 8916
> fax +61 3 9727 3491
> tony.rogers@ca.com <blocked::mailto:tony.rogers@ca.com>
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 21:10:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:09 GMT