Marc I obviously wasn't paying attention. Thanks Katy Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM> Sent by: Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM 14/11/2005 21:53 To Katy Warr/UK/IBM@IBMGB cc public-ws-addressing@w3.org Subject Re: Reference Parameters in WSDL We agreed to remove that last sentence at the F2F, its already gone in the latest editors draft[1] (its not yet in the HTML version but will be next time it gets generated). Marc. [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr- wsdl.xml?content-type=text/xml;%20charset=utf-8#refpinwsdl On Nov 14, 2005, at 11:53 AM, Katy Warr wrote: > > In the editor's draft of the WSDL spec: > > >> 4.3 Reference Parameters > >> > >> The wsa:ReferenceParameters element (see Web Services Addressing > 1.0 - Core[WS-Addressing-Core]) MAY be used as an extension child > element of > >> the wsdl20:endpoint or wsdl11:port elements. When present, the > value of the [reference parameters] message addressing property for > a message sent to an > >> endpoint MUST match the contents of the wsa:ReferenceParameters > extension element. If omitted, the value of the [reference > parameters] message > >> addressing property is empty. > > The final sentence "If omitted, the value of the [reference > parameters] message addressing property is empty." > appears to be restricting the addition of reference parameters > unless they are explicitly defined by the WSDL. I thought that the > intention was to enable a mechanism to define reference parameters > that the service requires, but not to restrict the sending of other > reference parameters that are not defined by the WSDL. Have I mis- > interpreted? > > Many thanks > Katy --- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com> Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 09:40:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:10 GMT