W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Question regarding cardinality of [destination]

From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 12:32:59 -0400
To: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Cc: "Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS)" <nilo.mitra@ericsson.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org, Rimas Rekasius <rimas@us.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <1116433979.14629.155.camel@localhost>
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 16:09 -0700, Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> My recollection is that we decided to do this for [address] property (in 
> EPR) as well.
> Did I get this wrong?

I believe we decided to disambiguate "mandatory" for [address],
[destination], and [action] but it hasn't been properly reflected in the
minutes. The comment from Rimas was only about the [destination]
property however [1].

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/lc-issues/#lc39

Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2005 16:40:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:09 UTC