W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > May 2005

Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-05-09

From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 11:57:22 -0700
Message-Id: <48b6f05d4907cbd0ef00f3845ba5f7d1@bea.com>
To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org

W3C Web Services Addressing Working Group - distributed meeting agenda
   Monday, 09 May
   20:00-22:00 UTC; 13:00-15:00 US/Pacific; 16:00-18:00 US/Eastern; 
21:00-23:00 UK/London; 22:00-24:00 FR/Paris; 6:00-8:00 (Tuesday) 
AU/Melbourne & AU/Brisbane
   Dial-in information on WG Admin page 
<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/admin>

1. Roll call, select scribe
(see scribe list below)

2. Agenda review, AOB

3. Call for corrections to the minutes
   - 2005-05-02: 
<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/05/02-ws-addr-minutes.html>

4. Review action items 
<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/admin#actionitems>
     2005-04-04: Hugo Haas to discuss issues surrounding WSDL document 
split with W3T/W3M, report back.  PENDING
     2005-04-19: lc5 - Glen Daniels to drive discussion.  PENDING
     2005-04-19: lc7 - David Orchard to respond to reviewer.  PENDING
     2005-04-19: lc13 - David Orchard to respond to reviewer.  PENDING
     2005-04-19: lc30 - †mit Yal¨õnalp to respond to reviewer.  DONE
     2005-04-19: lc32 - Jeff Mischkinsky to respond to reviewer.  PENDING
     2005-04-20: i017 - Anish Karmarkar to write a new proposal.  PENDING
     2005-05-02: David Hull to restate issue regarding 
wsdl:required='false' semantics.  PENDING
     2005-05-02: i060 - Jonathan Marsh to start discussion.  PENDING
     2005-05-02: lc34 - Marc Hadley to respond to Jonathan's proposal.  
DONE
     2005-05-02: lc26 - Nilo Mitra to respond to reviwer.  DONE
     2005-05-02: lc28 - Michael Eder to respond to reviewer.  DONE
     2005-05-02: lc36 - Rebecca Bergersen to respond ro reviewer.  DONE

5. Last Call Issues <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/>

* lc6 - Disambiguate the Conformance statements in WS-A SOAP Binding 
specification
* lc35 - Clarify conformance requirements
   Discussion: 
<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/05/02-ws-addr-minutes.html#item05>

* lc20 - Clarify Anonymous URI and for the case of HTTP responses
   F2F discussion: 
<http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/04/19-ws-addr-minutes.html#item20>

* lc33 - Binding rules don't appear to allow optional headers

* lc34 - Duplicate headers at the ultimate receiver
   ACTION: 2005-05-02: Marc Hadley to respond to Jonathan's proposal.  
DONE

* lc37 - More Security Considerations

* lc38 - Feedback on xs:nonNegativeInteger

* lc39 - Question regarding cardinality of [destination]

* lc40 - Example 3-1

* lc41 - Table 3-1

* lc42 - Order of items in section 3 and 3.1

* lc43 - S11 in Table 1-1

* lc44 - Section 4

* lc45 - Bad URL's

* lc46 - Section 3.2

* lc47 - Bad URL's

* lc48 - typo in xsd

* lc49 - Section 5

* lc50 - IRI for SOAP 1.2 Module and SOAP 1.1 Extension

* lc51 - order of items in section 2.3

* lc52 - MessageId vs MessageID

* lc53 - introduction of MAP and MEP terms

* lc55 - ReplyTo and security

* lc56 - Binding fault [detail] in SOAP 1.1 envelope

* lc57 - Normative text for fault properties binding

* lc58 - Intermediary Processing

* lc59 - Missing xml namespace prefix declaration

* lc60 - entire route in ws-addressing

* lc61 - Migration Contracts in Core

* lc62 - Migration Contracts in SOAP binding

* lc63 - Wording clarifications in Core Section 4

* lc64 - ws-addressing LC review editorial comments

* lc65 - use of IRIs in WS-Addressing

* lc66 - presentation of typing information in element descriptions

* lc67 - dereferencing namespace URI - but no link (editorial)

* lc68 - no mustUnderstand extensibility

* lc69 - mandatory ReplyTo, handling replies in WS-Addressing

* lc70 - mandatory action

* lc71 - mandatory fault reason

* lc72 - content of fault detail

* lc73 - nonNegativeInteger or duration for RetryAfter

* lc74 - Another Security Consideration

6. Other Business

-----------------------------------------------------------
Scribe list

A participant from the Member at the top of the list is expected to 
scribe the meeting. If no participant from that Member is able to 
scribe, a participant from the the next Member on the list is expected 
to scribe, and so forth. After one participant from a Member scribes, 
that Member's name goes to the bottom of the list.

Systinet
Arjuna
HP
SAP
Sonic
Nokia
ERICSSON
Nortel
Novell
Oracle
TIBCO
Hitachi
IBM
Datapower
Sun
webMethods
SeeBeyond
Fujitsu
IONA
Microsoft
BEA
W3C
CA
BT

See <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/minutes.html> for more information 
about taking minutes.


--
Mark Nottingham   Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO   BEA Systems
Received on Sunday, 8 May 2005 18:57:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:05 GMT