+1 Nilo > -----Original Message----- > From: Hugo Haas [mailto:hugo@w3.org] > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 2:16 AM > To: Jonathan Marsh > Cc: Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS); WS-Addressing > Subject: Re: wsa:Action in responses > > * Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com> [2005-03-18 14:21-0800] > > Are you proposing to remove "(and opaquely)"? > > Does it bring anything to the description of wsa:Action? > > My feeling is that "(and opaquely)" only brings confusion, so > I wouldn't be sad to see it go away if I'm right. > > So, yes, I'd like to propose to get rid of it. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ >Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 13:32:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:04 GMT