RE: A minor question from Rich Salz on 2005-03-17 (public-ws-addressing@w3.org from March 2005)

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:57:35 -0500 (EST)
To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
cc: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>, "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0503171856220.6825-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

> A fault is just a reply. So the relationship would be reply. You can
> tell it's a fault because SOAP defines a fault message very
> specifically.

This brings to mind another question.  Is it really *just* a reply,
or is it safe to assume that you won't be getting any more replies
after you get a fault?  (i.e., it's like a TCP close :)
	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html

Received on Friday, 18 March 2005 00:34:47 UTC