W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2005

Re: Charter requirements [was: Process requirements for going to Last Call]

From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:41:29 +0100
To: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050316154129.GG22257@w3.org>
* Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM> [2005-03-15 17:57-0500]
> On Mar 15, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> >
> >>The deliverables for the SOAP 1.1 and WSDL 1.1 bindings must include 
> >>language that the bindings are defined for backward compatibility 
> >>only. [20]
> >
> >Marc/Gudge, I thought we'd done this -- I don't see anything in the 
> >SOAP Binding doc. Am I missing it?
> >
> From the intro so the SOAP binding:
> 
> "WS-Addressing is conformant to the SOAP 1.2 [SOAP 1.2 Part 1: 
> Messaging Framework] processing model and is also compatible with SOAP  
> 1.1[SOAP 1.1] for backwards compatibility."

As this is burried in the section about namespaces, I would like to
add in the introduction of "4. SOAP 1.1 Addressing 1.0 Extension":

  This SOAP 1.1 extension is provided for backwards compatibility
  only.

> From the intro to the WSDL binding:
> 
> "WS-Addressing is designed to be able to work with WSDL  2.0 [WSDL 2.0] 
> and also (for backwards compatibility with WSDL 1.1  [WSDL 1.1] 
> described services."

Same comment here; I would move the sentence to the section 1. Introduction:

  WS-Addressing is designed to be able to work with WSDL 2.0 [WSDL
  2.0] and also (for backwards compatibility) with WSDL 1.1 [WSDL 1.1]
  described services.

Cheers,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/

Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 15:41:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:04 GMT