W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2005

i050: FaultTo fallback to ReplyTo rule

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:20:36 -0800
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A506D5FC27@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
I took an action to rewrite Tom's proposal 2 in terms of the rules for
formulating a reply message.

 

Currently the Core spec says, in section 3.2:

1.      Select the appropriate EPR:

o        If the reply is a normal message, select the EPR from the
incoming message's [reply endpoint] message addressing property. If none
is present, the processor MUST fault.

o        Otherwise, if the reply is a fault message and the incoming
message's [fault endpoint] message addressing property is not empty,
select the EPR from this property. If the [fault endpoint] property is
empty, the behavior of the recipient of the incoming message is
unconstrained by this specification.

 

I propose amending the second bullet point as follows:

1.      Select the appropriate EPR:

o        If the reply is a normal message, select the EPR from the
incoming message's [reply endpoint] message addressing property. If none
is present, the processor MUST fault.

o        Otherwise, if the reply is a fault message and the incoming
message's [fault endpoint] message addressing property is not empty,
select the EPR from this property. If the [fault endpoint] property is
empty, select the EPR from the incoming message's [reply endpoint]
message addressing property.  Otherwise, if the [reply endpoint]
property is empty, the behavior of the recipient of the incoming message
is unconstrained by this specification.

 
Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 22:21:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:04 GMT