I have realized that the additional proposals, 4 and 5, go beyond the scope of the original action item. At the time I wrote them, I was trying to optimize the use of "back channel" responses beyond what we had agreed to. Thus we should only look at proposals 1 thru 3 , as proposed by Mark in the original agenda: Proposal 5: <http://www.w3.org/mid/422CDD31.4050605@coastin.com> Tom Rutt wrote: > > I had previously sent two emails, I now have put both mails together > for the complete proposal for Issue 50. > > > ----- > > Tom Rutt > -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 21:09:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:04 GMT