W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2005

RE: What, if anything, comes back on the HTTP reply if fault is non-default?

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:29:05 -0800
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A506CB0040@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "David Hull" <dmh@tibco.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Doesn't the binding of SOAP to an underlying transport such as HTTP
answer that question? 

 

________________________________

From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Hull
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 10:05 AM
To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subject: What, if anything, comes back on the HTTP reply if fault is
non-default?

 

Eric Johnson of TIBCO caught this on review.  He asks

For example, if I'm using HTTP as the transport, a "fault" occurs, and
there is a "fault" header [and the reply is anonymous], what gets sent
back on the implied reply channel?  A "200 OK"?

There would be a similar question if the fault is anonymous and the
reply-to is present.
Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 00:29:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:04 GMT