RE: Editorial work on issue 53 complete

Yes, this would be an improvement.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-
> addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Vinoski, Stephen
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 4:59 PM
> To: Yalcinalp, Umit; public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Editorial work on issue 53 complete
> 
> 
> +1
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yalcinalp, Umit [mailto:umit.yalcinalp@sap.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 5:01 PM
> > To: Marc Hadley; public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: Editorial work on issue 53 complete
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
> > >[mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, Mar 08, 2005 12:57 PM
> > >To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> > >Subject: Editorial work on issue 53 complete
> > >
> > >
> > >All,
> > >
> > >I've incorporated the resolution to issue 53 as discussed on
> Monday,
> > >the two schema docs can be found at:
> > >
> > >http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr.xsd
> > >http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-add
> r-wsdl.xsd
> >
> >We didn't discuss this at the F2F (IIRC) but I wonder if we should
> >further split ws-addr.xsd to move the SOAP-binding-specific stuff
> into
> >a separate schema ?
> >
> >Marc.
> 
> Marc,
> 
> I just looked at the schemas you provided. I noticed that the top
> level
> elements are those that correspond to MAPs and EPR.
> 
> I would like to see MetaData element as a top level element to
> facilitate its reuse, but it is defined within the complexType
> EndpointReferenceType as a local element.
> 
> Therefore, this is a new issue with respect the schema, although it
> requires a very simple fix.
> 
> >
> >---
> >Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> >Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
> >
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --umit
> 
> >
> >
>

Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2005 18:09:30 UTC